|
Put on those buyer's shoes one more time and you'll find yourself shuffling past
companies with great management teams and excellent systems, but whose cash flow
is dependent on one or two customers. Why would buyers spend millions of dollars
on a business only to have those customers go elsewhere after they've acquired the
company? At the very most, a prudent buyer could structure a buyout to protect against
the loss of a key customer, probably by making much of the purchase price contingent
or requiring the seller to carry a note for the bulk of the purchase price. As a
seller, binding your financial well being (for several years) to your former company
and its customer is likely to be the last scenario you prefer.
Another important value driver, then, is the development of a customer base, in
which no single client accounts for more than approximately 10 percent of total
sales. It is important to talk to a trusted advisor about customer concentration
information specific to your industry. A large customer base helps to insulate a
company from the loss of any single customer.
Achieving this objective can be problematic when you are building a business with
limited resources and one or two good customers are willing to pay for everything
you can deliver. If this is the situation in which you find yourself, it is important
to consider beginning now to: (i) reinvest your profits into additional capacity that will make
developing a broader customer base possible, and/or (ii) acquire diversification
by buying smaller competitors.
High customer concentration can prevent a third-party sale of an otherwise attractive
company. Witness the situation with Double L Boilers, a hypothetical case study
of a profitable fabricator and installer of commercial heating systems.
Double L’s EBITDA exceeded $3 million per year, a strong management team was in
place and all systems were "go." So thought Lloyd and Larry, its owners, until the
investment bankers analyzed the company’s customer base and discovered that more
than 85 percent of the company’s revenues and profits derived from eight customers.
The owners didn’t quite understand why that fact presented a problem. After all,
those eight customers were long-time customers and provided a steadily increasing
cash flow to the business. Lloyd asked, "Why should we try to diversify when it
is all we can do to keep up with the new business from our existing customers?"
Double L’s most attractive buyer (a Fortune 100 company) provided the answer. It
insisted on meeting with each of the eight customers to determine their willingness
to remain with the company after it was sold.
Lloyd and Larry objected vehemently. What will our loyal customers think—and do—if
they assume that we’re selling our business? Will they stay as customers? What happens
if we don’t end up selling and they leave anyway? These owners realized that losing
even one customer would be a financial set-back and losing two or three spelled
disaster. Not only would the sale fall through, but the company might be thrown
into a financial tailspin.
These same insights prompted the would-be buyer to demand the interviews. It was
not prepared to pay $20 million for a business whose customer base and cash flow
might well decrease by 15 to 45 percent overnight—simply because the business was
under new ownership.
Lloyd and Larry faced a true dilemma: the only way to pursue the sale was to allow
this buyer to meet with their customers. If they refused, the sale process was over
and their dreams of cashing out and moving on into new lives would be put on hold - indefinitely.
If they allowed the buyer to meet their customers, the sale might fall through for
totally unrelated reasons, but Double L’s relationships with its customers might
be irretrievably harmed. Even if the sale did close, their customers’ potential
loss of confidence might cause them to bolt and jeopardize Larry and Lloyd’s earn
outs. Had this business had even 20 customers, the situation would not have surfaced.
In the end, Lloyd and Larry did allow the prospective buyer to meet with their customers.
All indicated that they would remain customers if the service level remained high.
As expected, the buyer’s terms included that the sale price would be reduced on
a percentage basis if any customer left within 30 months after the sale. Tough terms,
but the only ones that the buyer would accept.
As the Double L case study illustrates, it can be very important to establish a
diversified customer base early in the process of preparing your business exit.
After you have focused on this important value driver, the next step to creating
a company with strong value drivers is to establish realistic growth strategies.
The next Exit Planning Review™ article will discuss this value driver in more detail.
If you have any questions about increasing the value of your business prior to your
exit, please contact us to discuss your particular situation. We can help guide
you through the process of identifying the current value drivers in your business
and creating a road map for increasing value to meet your overall exit objectives.
Subsequent issues of The Exit Planning Review™ discuss all aspects of
Exit Planning. The provider of this Newsletter (Michael C. Valdez, CFP, CLU, REBC, AIF) offers you unbiased information about what you may need
to know How To Run Your Business So You Can Leave It In Style™.
^Top
|