|
As discussed in the
previous issues of The Exit Planning Review™, it is important to understand
the tax and other implications associated with the three most common business-active
child transfer techniques. In the past issue, we discussed the advantages and disadvantages
of selling stock and gifting stock. The last scenario that we will look at during
this Exit Planning Review™ series of articles is transferring ownership via a stock
bonus.
A business owner who is primarily concerned with transferring ownership with minimal
tax consequences and who has sufficient personal financial resources so that receiving
payment for the ownership interest being transferred is not essential may be able
to efficiently transfer ownership using a stock bonus. This technique can offer
some interesting tax and other advantages.
As basis for our discussion on stock bonus plans, we will continue looking at the hypothetical
Ted Stevens case study. As we’ve discussed in the previous articles, Ted Stevens
wanted to transfer 20 percent of his $5 million S corporation to his business-active
child, Sharon O’Meara, as soon as possible. Ted also did not need any money from
this initial transfer of ownership to meet his other exit objectives.
If Ted transfers the entire 20 percent ownership interest to Sharon in a single
stock bonus with a value of $650,000, she must recognize income equal to the value
of the bonus shares if the shares are transferred free of forfeiture restrictions.
Therefore, Sharon will owe tax of approximately $260,000. The company can award
an additional cash bonus of $430,000 (known as a “gross-up”), which will result
in an additional tax amount owed by Sharon of approximately $172,000, leaving $258,000
from the cash bonus for Sharon to cover the tax owed on the original stock bonus.
Sharon will end up paying a total of $430,000 in taxes (combined tax for the stock
bonus and cash bonus), and she has $430,000 in cash to pay it. Sharon will immediately
own 20 percent of the company. Meanwhile, the company will have a deduction in the
amount of $1,080,000 (the value of the $650,000 stock bonus plus the $430,000 cash
bonus), which results in tax savings of $432,000.
Had the stock bonus not been granted at all, the company (actually Ted, since it
is an S corporation) would have owed $432,000 in tax on the income earned by the
business, of which there would be no offsetting deduction. Instead, a 20 percent
ownership interest in the company has been transferred and the total tax of $432,000
paid by Sharon ($260,000 for the stock bonus and $172,000 for the cash bonus) essentially
makes the transaction cash flow neutral to the parties, since it is the same amount
that Ted would have paid had it not been paid by Sharon. It is important to recall
that the undiscounted value of the 20 percent ownership interest is $1 million;
therefore, a significant amount of value has been transferred without incurring
additional net tax consequences (other than Medicaid tax on the bonus). The transfer
also has been completed in a single year.
Additional Design Options of a Stock Bonus Plan
Stock bonus plans have additional features that add flexibility and can allow you
to maintain control. For instance, when used in situations for business-active children
or for key employees who are not your children, the bonus can be combined with a
“substantial risk of forfeiture.” Therefore, if your employee leaves the company
within a specified number of years following the bonus or if certain performance
benchmarks are not attained, the bonus shares are forfeited or taken back by the
company at no value. This creates “golden handcuffs” similar to vesting in non-qualified
deferred compensation plans. Also, if your child, having received ownership, decides
within a few years that he or she doesn’t want the business, you can regain ownership
at minimal cost. This is a very important feature of stock bonus programs that isn’t
available if unrestricted ownership is transferred by sale or gift.
Additionally, a bonus of a smaller amount of stock can be used to “jump start” an
employee’s or child’s acquisition of the balance of the company through future stock
purchases. This is a low cost way to increase the cash flow that the employee has
available to make promissory note payments if additional stock is later purchased.
He or she will own the bonused stock free and clear, so the cash flow from those
shares can be combined with cash flow from shares being purchased to facilitate
the purchase payments.
Conclusion
When you are transferring your company to a business-active child, it is important
to look at the advantages and disadvantages of the three most common transfer techniques
– gifting ownership, selling ownership and transferring ownership via a stock bonus.
Although each technique has its own advantages, the stock bonus plan can be the most
tax effective method in many cases, especially when you don’t need to receive money
in exchange for the stock or the future cash flow attributable to the transferred
ownership. The stock bonus also is gift tax effective because this method may not
have gift tax consequences when properly designed. Additionally, the stock bonus
plan can allow you to maintain control during the transfer while handcuffing the
successor in his or her commitment to the ownership and success of the company.
Although it may not be appropriate in every business-active child transfer, the
stock bonus plan can be an advantageous exit path that can meet your overall exit
objectives.
If you have any questions about transferring your company to a business-active child
via a stock bonus plan, please contact us to discuss your particular situation.
Subsequent issues of The Exit Planning Review™ discuss all aspects of
Exit Planning. The provider of this Newsletter (Paul Honeycutt) offers you unbiased information about what you may need
to know How To Run Your Business So You Can Leave It In Style™.
^Top
|